# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs

LeftWing2

Campaign 4 Public Ownership

FASO

FASSIT

Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos

Unity-Injustice




Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner

Machetera

Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist

Agitprop

British Politics

Censorship 01

Collaborators

Gimlet

Imperialism

Memories

Mexico

New Britain 01

New Britain 02

Sleaze

Social Work Industry

Wankblogs

Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed





17 March 2008
Labour will lose the next general election
I'll stick my neck out and say that Labour is going to lose the next election.

I began to think that two weeks ago during lunch with the journalist Neil Clark in Oxford. Neil reported that something like 700 pubs have shut since the smoking ban came into force last year. I remarked that nothing was more likely to cheese off the last working class votes that Labour had than to see their local swill shop close down.

Of course it isn't just the smoking ban that will cost Labour the next election. The ban, though, is symptomatic of a polity that has become disengaged from the electorate and their concerns. To give just one example, the war against Iraq is not something that features much in conversation, but the cost of utility bills does. It may be argued that the parties have never fully represented the wishes of their supporters, if they had, then Labour would be the party of capital punishment. However, the parties represented some of their supporters wishes and desires - enough of them to ensure that the core vote would turn out at election time.

Today neither of the two main parties, but especially Labour, can be said to articulate the desires of anyone other than a small, metropolitan elite, who are unconcerned about house prices, utility bills, or immigration. Labour will pay the price for that at the next election.

Secondly, there is about the Labour government an air of cack-handedness that fairly takes the breath away. It is not just the loss of two million people's personal data that was contained on computer disks that some pen pusher mislaid, it is the sheer level of incompetence that seems to emerge with every day that passes. Today for instance it emerged that Leeds Magistrates' Court has managed to forget to pass on several hundred convictions to the National Police Computer.

This level of incompetence has been matched by an equally unpleasant level of sleaze that threatens the Tory record set during the Thatcher and Major years. The Lee Jasper affair in London is just one example of a Labour Party that seem to be more concerned with handing out goodies to its sinecurists than it does with aiding its traditional supporters.

Finally, does it really matter if labour loses? It is not as if the party has done much to unravel the Thatcherite changes of the 1980s. Why should a working man, living on a northern council estate, really give a stuff about which of these gangs of thieves has their paws on the levers of power?

Labels:

4 Comments:

I think you're right, both in your prediction and in the reasoning behind it. I just can't see anyone working up any enthusiasm for this lot. Our thin Tory friend recently wrote something similar in an article, and I told him his piece could almost have been written by your good self. The pubs and the utility bills are bad enough, and rise in food prices is making its presence felt, but I don't think we've seen anything like the worst in being screwed by the banks yet.

Can't really disagree with your last para, except to point out that that is what they were saying in early 1979.....it can ALWAYS get worse.

17 March 2008 at 21:22  

Hi exile, I hope you are well.

There are lots of reasons the government is in trouble, but why the Tories are just as bad. One is maybe the plight of the Southall Black Sisters, who are a pioneering anti domestic-violence group who have been around since 1979 and who have provided a refuge for minority women and a phoneline for battered women everywhere who have nowhere to turn.
The Tories in Ealing are trying to withdraw funding for the sisters. not a peep from David Cameron of course. When challened a couple of weeks ago, however, the local council claimed they were acting on government orders to withdraw 'ethnic' funds to make society more integrated.
There you go. Plenty to waste on glossy brochures and mad eco-schemes; nothing to spend on an organisation that's been protecting beaten women for thirty years. They're a public menace, apparently.
It really is disgusting and the more publicity the sisters get the better. I hope you feel inclined to put something up about them.
All the best to you, and I am glad that you seem to be over your health problems.
Yours,
Martin Meenagh

17 March 2008 at 22:09  

1979 was preceded by two years of proto-Thatcherism. Those wars are over as far as the parties are concerned, and the new, Blatcherite consensus involves Thatcherism with Blairite sanctimony.

I know nothing about Southall Black Sisters, Martin, but I wish you luck with the campaign.

On a personal note, my health has actually deteriorated, and I expect to have to wait until July to go into hospital.

18 March 2008 at 08:41  

Neil Clark is scrumptious.

19 March 2008 at 13:26  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home