# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

08 February 2008
Why the socialist press is unread
When, if ever, will a left press start to get readers? That's the question that Dave's Part asked recently, and your friendly Exile thinks that the answer is never - at least not so long as the left press remains in the hands of boring buggers.

The first problem that the left has is that it tries to preach to people. The Morning Star and Socialist Worker are not in the business of providing news from a working class perspective. What they try to do is present news that they think the working class needs, the aim being to then recruit members to the cause. Unfortunately for them, ordinary people don't want to be preached to by some loon in grannie glasses and a Mao hat, and that is the first reason why the left press loses out to the right.

Secondly, far too much of the socialist press - and socialists in general - take an attitude of po-faced morality to their politics. They want to make the world over again and their socialism has roots in that morality. Working class people just simply want more money for less bastard work, and a healthy degree of control over the work process. This inability to stop moralising about issues that ordinary people are indifferent to means that fewer and fewer people regard socialism as having any relevance to them.

Finally, and here is the rub, most people are not interested in politics. They are interested in sleaze and sport, and if anyone doubts that all they have to do is consider the circulation figures for the various papers.

The trick for any socialist is to give the readers what they want and then slip in a bit of the politics by the back door. The other option, of course, is to continue along the familiar path and only preach to the already converted.

The first option is the one that I have chosen for The Exile. Thanks to the lovely Stephanie I am getting more readers than ever before. Most will only be interested in her - and who can blame them?- but some will stick around and read other things.

That is also why I have been posting a lot on the social work filth and their activities. Working class people just happen to hate them, so here is a chance to make the connection between a parasitic middle class that acts as our colonial rulers, and the world that we now have to endure.

Will the socialist press follow my lead? Almost certainly not and that is why the socialist press will remain unread.



More grist for your mill, Exile: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/08/nflee108.xml

You have an entertaining blog and much of what you say in this latest post is very wise.

8 February 2008 at 23:01  

Jesus fucking Christ - I can't believe that report.

I won't blog about it today because few people read blogs over the weekend - it will be the Monday posting.

Thank you for the link.

8 February 2008 at 23:45  

Yup - that's how it is.

Might change your views on globalisation; the latter word meaning that people now have connections abroad - no reason why that should be limited to the upper classes - and can get the hell out into another jurisdiction, just like the rich do. Wait and see where I'll be blogging from after my court case with the ex-wife....

10 February 2008 at 01:25  

It might be better to wait until Monday which is when my posting will go up. In the meantime I will just point out that this family can get out precisely because they are upper-middle-class. Globalisation has nothing to do with it.

10 February 2008 at 01:32  

Yes, you're possibly right. I say "possibly" because I have no idea how to define "globalisation". Nor "upper-middle-class" for that matter.

10 February 2008 at 23:38  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home