# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs

LeftWing2

Campaign 4 Public Ownership

FASO

FASSIT

Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos

Unity-Injustice




Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner

Machetera

Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist

Agitprop

British Politics

Censorship 01

Collaborators

Gimlet

Imperialism

Memories

Mexico

New Britain 01

New Britain 02

Sleaze

Social Work Industry

Wankblogs

Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed





08 January 2008
Tension increases in Straights of Hormuz
What exactly happened yesterday in the Straights of Hormuz? According to the Americans, three U.S. warships were harassed by five or so Iranian fast patrol boats. The Iranians for their part say that they challenged three unidentified vessels, and once their identities were made clear the matter ended.

Neither side seems to want to take the issue any further. The Americans have not lodged any formal protests and the Iranians are not screaming for a United Nations Resolution or anything like that.

It's pure speculation on my part, but could the fuss be due to some continued infighting between the Washingtonian war party, headed by Dick Cheney and the adult faction which seems to have Condaleeza Rice as its head? In other words what happened was a fairly typical bit of posturing in the Straights, which the war party tried to use to increase tension. However, the fact that the USA is not lodging any protests over the incident, suggests to me that the warmongers have been slapped down pretty firmly by the State Department.

If this is what happened then perhaps the war party's star really is on the wane?
1 Comments:

In other words what happened was a fairly typical bit of posturing in the Straights, which the war party tried to use to increase tension.

I think that is correct, provided you -- correctly -- identify the "war party" as Iran.

What those who claim the US wants to go to war with Iran need to explain at this point is why a perfect causus belli for the supposed neo-con warmongering seems to have slipped through American fingers. What transpired hardly fits your script, does it?

10 January 2008 at 15:58  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home