# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

23 November 2006
Why Neil Clark launched his libel action - and why he needs our support
Back in March of this year this blog took a strong line against libel actions between bloggers. Neil Clark had threatened to sue one of the more risible of the NuLab wankbloggers and we argued that such tactics only serve to allow the wankist's little friends to crawl out of the woodwork and start a smear campaign. Neil's action has been dismissed by the court, and that is exactly what is happening.

Neil has posted an essay which outlines his reasons for taking the action:
I went to the courts not to silence Kamm's right to make fair comments on articles with which he disagreed, but to prevent Kamm and his neo-con, pro-war associates from silencing me. Their aim was - and still is- to get editors, like Robbie Millen and Daniel Finkelstein of The Times, Tom Switzer of the Australian, Seumas Milne of the Guardian, and Sam Leith of the Books section of the Daily Telegraph to stop publishing my work.
Neil goes on to present an e-mail that was sent to one such editor, so obviously something is going on: put bluntly there does seem to be a campaign to prevent Neil Clark from earning a living.

Frankly, this is something that should worry all of us. For free speech to flourish, people have to be sure that their livelihoods will not be threatened. If that does not happen, then many people will be intimidated out of blogging.

This could be what the wankblogs actually want. Theirs is the NuLab world where people like Neil Clark have to be silenced because what they say runs against the nice, middle class line thatwe are all middle class, now, and only the market can solve our country's ills.

Or it could be that because they have nice, well cushioned positions, it amuses them to cause grief to a man whose only income - an income that he uses to support his family with - is from his writing.

Either way, they are scum, and because they are scum and because Neil's only crime is to write what they want suppressed, we owe him our support. Agree with him or not, if you read a blog you must support the blogger's right to publish without worrying that his employer will persecute him for his offerings.

I hate to say it, but in allowing one of his commenters to name a specific individual as 'George Courtenay' (since Clark personally vets all comments on his blog prior to publication, he cannot claim ignorance of their content), he's lost any sympathy that he might have justifiably gained from Courtenay's despicable actions.

Not least because directly accusing a named individual of trying to destroy a man's career is far more directly libellous than anything that Oliver Kamm wrote about Clark.

But then Clark does have a truly amazing ability to shoot himself in the foot, doesn't he? As you yourself advised, if he hadn't gone down the libel action route in the first place, he'd be firmly atop the moral high ground, thumbing his nose at the pygmies below. Instead, he's just proved that he's as much of a hypocrite as the rest of them.

23 November 2006 at 15:17  

Life's a bitch, eh? Then you... nevermind.

One thing the genuine Left has to understand (who cares about the faux Left. Let `em sink) is that this isn't croquet or cricket here: these people -- the ones you have to watch out for in real life, that is -- play for keeps.

So don't expect not to be kicked in the balls when you're not looking. And enjoy fucking them good when you can. They deserve it, remember.

And don't lose a wink of sleep over it either.

24 November 2006 at 11:58  

fyi Gojira, I only went 'down the libel road' because of the attempt to prevent me from earning a living. What would you do if people were emailing to your employers,under what appears to be an ficticious name, libellous information about you, published by someone who probably thought he was too wealthy ever to be defeated in a courtroom and therefore could make whatever allegations he liked?

24 November 2006 at 12:03  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home