# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

28 November 2006
Why the Americans refuse to face up to their Iraqi reality
Why won't the Americans admit that Iraqis are fighting a civil war, as well as an anti-imperialist one?

Most wars of national independence are also civil wars. The problem is that few people ever want to admit to that fact. Take the American War of Independence as a case in point, because it could also be called The First American Civil War. About a quarter of the white, male population - some 250,000 men - opposed independence in the 1770s. Some 19,000 of them joined the loyalist regiments that fought to keep the 13 colonies in the empire.

Political scientists have a fairly simple definition of what a civil war is: the conflict must be within one territory, and involve fighting for control of the centre, to seceed from it, or to force the central government to change a major policy. Secondly, at least 1,000 people must have been killed, with at least a 100 on both or all sides. Using that yardstick, Iraq is clearly involved in a civil war that runs in tandem with its war to expell the foreign occupiers.

The American media has just woken up to this fact and has started calling the intra-Iraqi conflict a civil war. So why is the White House denying it?

One possible reason is that "many politicians, especially those who support the war, believe there would be domestic political implications to declaring it a civil war. They fear that an acknowledgment by the White House and its allies would be seen as an admission of a failure of President Bush’s Iraq policy."

Put another way, the chimp will not allow the words "civil war" to cross his lips because to admit to that reality would make his failed Iraqi adventure seem even more of a failure.

Is that about the size of it?

Mass propaganda is an amazing phenomenon, isn't it? People will actually deny the reality in front of everyone's faces, simply because no one wants to be the one 'caught out'. So fuck all these intellectual cowards; even if the secret police do show up at your door for merely parting from the script -- just like in the heyday of good old Joe Stalin.

And I don't really like that bourgeois, academic/legalistic definition of "civil war" for that matter either. There's a better -- marxist -- interpretation.

1 December 2006 at 11:02  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home