# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs

LeftWing2

Campaign 4 Public Ownership

FASO

FASSIT

Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos

Unity-Injustice




Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner

Machetera

Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist

Agitprop

British Politics

Censorship 01

Collaborators

Gimlet

Imperialism

Memories

Mexico

New Britain 01

New Britain 02

Sleaze

Social Work Industry

Wankblogs

Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed





16 November 2006
America may increase her troop numbers in Iraq
Over the last few days we have speculated on how America will cut and run from Iraq. The Guardian reports today that they will take the lunatic option which is to increase troop numbers by about 20,000, and then make a final push to take control of Baghdad.

This is the lunatic option for two reasons:

1. Another 20,000 men may be able to take Baghdad, but they will not be able to hold it. The guerrillas may take a holiday, or they may go off and fight in other areas - areas that have been stripped of troops for the great, Baghdad push. Either way, they will filter back into Baghdad and start doing their thing just as soon as the Americans reduce their troop levels or lower their guard.

2. The Americans are weary of the war. It does not take a guerrilla genius to realise that all they have to do is take the hit and then counter-attack in their own good time. The Iraqis have time on their side: the Americans do not.

Is this option being seriously discussed? Yes, if you believe the reports that are coming out. Why are senior American generals in favour? Probably because they cannot get away from the idea of one big battle that will decide the war. Their reasoning seems to be that if they put enough troops into an area, then the guerrillas will rise to the bait and pile all their forces into that area.

However, nothing in the almost four years of conflict leads us to conclude that the Iraqis are that daft. That the Americans are even thinking of putting this strategy into effect suggests that they are condemned to learn nothing from the past.
2 Comments:

632C5R09OW8

ftssoldier.blogspot.com
www.edwardsaid.org

Exile check these new blogs out,:

http://www.liverpooltimes.net/
http://www.kirkbytimes.co.uk/

there written by someone from
liverpool.

this here is an energy blog:

http://energyoutlook.blogspot.com/

19 November 2006 at 00:39  

Point is that the generals don't know what the fuck to do -- but can't admit it. So they throw more of the same at the problem, hoping to roll boxcars. Or 9/11 -- I mean 7/11.

But it loox like Murder Inc. -- i.e. the neocon deathsquad/Mossad hitmen teams -- have lent the bamboozled generals a helping hand by way of Beirut... The idea being to short-circuit the "realists"' plan to 'let bygones be bygones' with the iranis and surians...

Obvious, idn't it? Unless you actually believe the canned propaganda bilge passing for news and analysis in the bourgeois mass-media.

24 November 2006 at 12:23  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home