# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs

LeftWing2

Campaign 4 Public Ownership

FASO

FASSIT

Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos

Unity-Injustice




Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner

Machetera

Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist

Agitprop

British Politics

Censorship 01

Collaborators

Gimlet

Imperialism

Memories

Mexico

New Britain 01

New Britain 02

Sleaze

Social Work Industry

Wankblogs

Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed





14 November 2006
America likely to run later, says one commentator
In out last posting we argued that the USA faced two options in Iraq: walk out now or get thrown out later. William S. Lind has just argued that the latter option is the one the Americans will take:
What, then, will keep us in Iraq? While both parties want to get out, neither has nor will be able to create a consensus on how to get out. Not only will they be unable to generate a consensus between the parties, or between the executive branch and the Congress, they will not be able to find consensus within either party on how the withdrawal is to be managed. The result will be paralysis and a continuation of the war.
He goes on to write that neither political party wants to be tarred with the "you lost Iraq" label, but believes that the main reason for indecision is that the invaders really have "no good option" left. If they stay they will continue to be shagged by the resistence; if they leave, civil war may make Iraq an ungovernable wasteland. The best option would be for a Sunni strongman to emerge out of the chaos, says Lind, but he concludes that this is not very likely.

This is tough on Iraq, but good news for the rest of the planet. The fear has to be that the Americans will bite the bullet and call it a day over there. Then they will learn the wrong lessons from the defeat: instead of realising that imperialism's day is done, they will come to believe that the weapons and tactics used were all wrong. Thus, having assimilated all the wrong ideas, they could go off and attack yet another third world country.

The only way to avoid this is if the USA stays the course in Iraq until their army is so comprehensively broken that they can stay no more.
1 Comments:

That's why empires fall: they can't stay; and they can't go either -- for all sorts of internal reasons, which have little to do with the mess they arrogantly got themselves into in the first place...

What these shits are going to do is try something desperate now. Maybe 9/11 Mark II. The world will simply not be safe until the U.S. military machine is crushed -- which means until the U.S. state is crushed. Which means the overthrow of the U.S. government and its capitalist system.

So I think any number of these All-American nazis would prefer Götterdämmerung to humiliation. "Après Moi, le Déluge!", eh wot?

Fascist assholes in pinstripes. Or Dicks.

15 November 2006 at 08:56  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home