# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

20 September 2006
Sudan: the wankblogs demand action!
Staying on the theme of Sudan, and following on from the last posting - scroll down, folks, you can do it - Jonathan Steele has an article in The Guardian which takes the wankers for war to task with the argument that:
The so-called janjaweed militias that Khartoum organised and armed did not distinguish between civilians and guerrilla fighters. They burned huts, raped women and put tens of thousands of civilians to flight, forcing them across the border into Chad or into camps inside Darfur. But the rebels also committed atrocities, a fact that was rarely reported since it upset the black-and-white moral image that many editors preferred.
OK, so what we have here is a nasty tribal conflict where nobody much cares about the rules of warfare. On the specific charge of genocide, something which the wankblogs are always, well, wanking about, Steele has this to say:
In spite of efforts to describe the killing in Darfur as genocide, neither the UN nor the EU went along with this description. It was not because of moral myopia, but because they understood the difference between a brutal civil war and a deliberate policy of ethnic cleansing. Darfur is not Rwanda. Only the US accepted the genocide description, though this seemed a concession to domestic lobbies rather than a matter of conviction. Washington never followed through with the forcible intervention in Darfur that international law requires once a finding of genocide is made.
Now, one can accept or reject Steele's argument, but what one cannot do is claim that it is not a coherent case. The same cannot be said of the wankblogs - their arguments are little more than dodgy rhetoric and personal abuse.

The dodgiest case is made by the old Wankmaster-General himself, Norman Geras. He starts off with these words:
It wasn't rape, it was a domestic conflict.
Then he proceeds to demolish that argument. The problem is that it wasn't Steele's argument and those are not Steele's words. It is the oldest trick in the book: set up an Aunt Sally and then attack that, rather than what the writer actually wrote.

Following on from that the old Wankmaster quotes from the relevant genocide convention, and challenges Steele to show why this doesn't "now apply in Darfur".

Er, can someone please tell the Wankmaster that you can't prove a negative? Besides, it is not our job to demonstrate that genocide didn't happen: it is the wankers' task to show that it did.

As for the personal abuse, well, who better to turn to than our old friends at the Hand Shandy For War blog? Click over there and have a laugh. Yes, we know, that is all anyone does with this site, but go and have an extra deep belly laugh.

All in all, if this is the best that the wankblogs can do, then they have an uphill task in persuading us that a third war against a Moslem country is necessary.



Much of the so-called Left thinx in petit-bourgeois terms. That's a fact. And so they cannot grasp that a situation can be BOTH bad in a country AND the imperialists still have no right to interfere there. As if these pirates had pure motives anyway -- which they most certainly do not.

With their simplistic, bourgeois empirical logic, this faux Left can only conceive all situations to be 'either/or', 'black or white', 'Good or Evil', etc. There is no middle ground with these people; certainly no dialectikal -- or even subtle -- logic. They are indeed the pathetic fools you demonstrate them to be. At least the bloodsport here is enjoyable in that regard... but it's still a bit too much like shooting fish in a barrel, wot.

Frankly, it pains me to read this stuff you dredge up over at their intellectual cesspool, Exile. And most especially it pains me that these useful idiots still have influence in the world. We should be far beyond this mental colonialism they exhibit: this bourgeois hegemony colonizing the mind of a supposed socialist, working-class Left.

But I guess they're not that either, really.
Poseurs, all.

21 September 2006 at 03:13  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home