# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

07 May 2006
What is the Blair strategy?
The dust has now settled on Friday's cabinet reshuffle and a few things are becoming clearer. The first is that the most likely reason why John Prescott has kept his cabinet seat is that he is also deputy leader of the Labour Party. Had Tony Blair dropped him then he might have resigned, thus precipitating a deputy leadership election. This is the last thing that Blair needs right now, so that might explain why 2 shags gets to keep his cabinet seat.

Secondly, his reshuffle can be seen as a two-fingered gesture to Gordon Brown to try his luck if he thinks he's tasty enough. It is unlikely that Brown will have the bottle to take Blair on directly, and it looks as if this is what Blair is relying on.

The problem that Blair has is that most of the party loath him. They signed a Devil's Bargain 12 years ago when this git was elected Labour leader. He promised them victory and they agreed to leave to one side all the reasons that Labour exists. Thus there has been no nationalisations, no higher taxes and no nods to anti-Europeanism and anti-Americanism. This cheesed off the party's members, many of whom resigned in protest, but it kept the parliamentary party in line. Now that bargain is starting to unravel as backbenchers circulate a letter that threatens a leadership challenge if Blair does not name his resignation day. To mount such a challenge the rebels need the signatures of 70 MPs. The matter would then be referred to the party conference in September. Assuming that the conference agrees, a leadership contest that could last about two months would then be held. The new leader would take office in November.

Clearly the party would be damaged by this six months' battle and that is what Blair seems to be relying on. That and the cowardice of Gordon Brown.

So, like... when "World O' Gangsters" (WOG) finally does do the nasty with Iran -- this means that the Benighted Kingdom is finally onside again..?

7 May 2006 at 11:55  

Hey, aren't you spending a little too much time on this Blair thing? You're in Mexico for goodness sake...get out there and vacation or something!

7 May 2006 at 17:11  

I don't think it's necessarily cowardice on the part of Brown, more that he realises that a leadership election would make the Labour Party even less popular with the voters (if that's possible) and thus destroy his chances of becoming PM...

7 May 2006 at 21:56  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home