# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

28 May 2006
British army suffering from a massive desertion rate.
As British forces get involved in what history will probably call the Fourth Afghan War, news is coming through that at least 1,000 troops have deserted from the army since the war against Iraq began.

The BBC reports that opposition to the war is the root of this, but the Exile is inclined to wonder if the lack of equipment is also a factor? The latest news is that the RAF doesn't have enough transport aircraft to ferry the troops out of Iraq on time and maintain a supply to the Afghan force. This comes hard on the heels of the lack of ammunition and shortage of boots fiasco.

Frankly, it's a wonder that Britain still has an army.


Little Green Soccer Balls now has a posting on this theme. True to type they are trying to muddy the waters by claiming that the Absent Without Leave (AWOL) figures are the same as usual. That may be the case, but we are not talking about AWOL, are we? The matter under debate is desertion, and that is not the same thing. When a soldier goes AWOL he intends to return; when he deserts he doesn't.

The desertion rate has climbed dramatically since the war against Iraq began. The only people who are interested in the AWOL figures are those who want to confuse the gullible. Still, a good try, lads, and it's just a pity for you that some of us can spot old wank when we see it.

Here's to the complete collapse of the british military and the imperialism it's there to serve and protect. I've had more than enuff of these Colonel Blimp types over here too.

And like I said elsewhere, it appears that the rooskies and the chinese are more than willing to tie the anglo-imperialists down in Central Asia with only a modest, 'hands-off' investment in the other side on their part.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving crew.

28 May 2006 at 12:34  

It's a lie.


28 May 2006 at 15:33  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home