# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs


Campaign 4 Public Ownership



Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos


Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner


Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist


British Politics

Censorship 01






New Britain 01

New Britain 02


Social Work Industry


Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed

09 March 2006
A modest proposal for an Independent Labour Party
A new socialist blog has just started up, and it looks good so far. One posting had me nodding my head wearily as the writer listed the various grouplets that have tried, and failed, to become the voice of the British working class. I have to be honest and say that the last thing we need right now is yet another set of initials.

So what can be done? Well, one of the reasons why these new parties fail to get off the ground is that they don't have roots in any local community. If we look back to 1893 and the birth of the Independent Labour Party, we can see that what actually happened in Bradford was the coming together of many local groups and parties, quite a few of which that had been in existence for around a decade by that time. In other words people were not being asked to support a new party; they carried on supporting the local group that already existed.

A second reason why these new parties fail is that they tend to be run by infantile Trots who think that the revolution is just around the corner. The latest seems to be the Socialist Party, formerly known as Militant. Anything that Trots touch they fuck up - in that they are fully in tune with their mentor who ended up head-butting an ice pick.

It is far better to take a leaf out of the old ILP's book and form an alliance between socialists and labourists. The reason why the proposal, debated at Bradford, to call the new party the Socialist Labour Party was defeated was due to the fact that the bulk of the delegates knew that the majority of working class people were not socialists. However, labourism, coming as it does from the unions, was something that the ordinary person could relate to.

That common sense approach is something that is sadly lacking today. People from the labourite wing of the movement are just as cheesed off and isolated as we are. It makes no sense at all to leave them on the sidelines by setting up yet another socialist sect. We need to unite socialists and labourists under one banner.

Hence the modest proposal. Let socialists and labourists build their local parties and groups and when there are enough of them - and when they are winning council seats and when union branches and trades' councils are supporting them - then let us have a conference to set up a new party that will act as a voice for the urban working class.

As part of this modest proposal, I would suggest that if we ever get to the stage where enough groups exist to form a new party, then we take our cue from Bradford in 1893. The party should be called the Independent Labour Party and the conference should simply re-adopt the original consitution.



I have to totally disagree with your analysis -- but by all means let a thousand flowers bloom. There are a thousand roads to Socialism at least (most of them so treacherous tho', that just one misstep -- and it's over the cliff you go...)

The problem with Trotskyism has as much to do with timing and overwhelming odds as mistakes emanating from small communist groups. For instance the U.S. and UK have been busy de-industrializing -- shipping jobs overseas looking for superprofits with which to arrest the decline in the rate of profit for yet one more decade. -- so the lack of a proper 21st Century marxist analysis has all of us floundering about, trying to deal with that (and much else besides). As if that will save the capitalists in the end... It just prolongs the world's misery.

The real problem is the lack of a comprehensive materialist analysis of the present world situation -- not some poor little group's inability to "connect" with service workers, say. If circumstances were right, a classic trotskyist approach would look like a miracle. But maybe that chance has gone forever, eh? On to Trotskyism/Marxism Marx II, then.

11 March 2006 at 02:42  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home