# Contact info submission url: exile-blog.blogspot.com site_owner: address1: address2: city: state: country: postal_code: phone_number: display_email: site_name: site_description: The Exile

E-Mail Me

My Twitter

Top Blogs

LeftWing2

Campaign 4 Public Ownership

FASO

FASSIT

Mothers For Justice

Ian Josephs

UKSecretCourt's Videos

Unity-Injustice




Chris Paul

David Lindsay

Heresy Corner

Machetera

Martin Meenagh

Neil Clark

Organised Rage

Renegade Eye

Serb Blog

Splintered Sunrise

Star of Vergina

Unrepentant Communist

Agitprop

British Politics

Censorship 01

Collaborators

Gimlet

Imperialism

Memories

Mexico

New Britain 01

New Britain 02

Sleaze

Social Work Industry

Wankblogs

Working Class

Atom Feed

XML Feed





06 March 2006
British to abandon Iraq? What about the USA?
Conflicting news is coming out of Iraq. On the one hand The Sunday Telegraph reported yesterday that the Anglo-American occupation forces will be withdrawn by the summer of 2007. On the other, American sources have dismissed this claim and reiterated the old line that the troops will remain, so long as the Iraqis need them. (Ho-hum)

The Telegraph report strikes me as the most likely, mainly because it came with the confirmation that the British involvement in occupying Afghanistan may last a further ten years. The British army cannot occupy both Iraq and Afghanistan, so it looks like the British are preparing the ground for the end of the Iraq adventure.

However, the report also states that the Anglo-American forces will abandon Iraq together, but since all the sources for this report seem to be British, the cynic is inclined to ask, just how firm is the American committment to leave the country? It could be that the British are talking up withdrawal in the hope that the Americans may be forced by popular pressure at home to come on board.
2 Comments:

You've got Bill O'Reilly now advocating "cut and run", which he badmouthed before. Part of his reason is that the people there are "crazy", and we can't work with them, especially when they're at civil war with each other.

Then there were reports that maybe the US had something to do with the mosque bombing. Are they provoking civil war so they can leave Iraq?

Some food for thought.

6 March 2006 at 05:42  

Then there were reports that maybe the US had something to do with the mosque bombing. Are they provoking civil war so they can leave Iraq?

No -- they're trying to provoke civil war so that they can break the country into bite-sized chunks and win. Like they did Jugoslavija and, to some extent, Rossiya -- and like they're planning for Iran now.

Divide & conquer.

7 March 2006 at 18:41  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home